Authors of six machine-learning preprints listed on arXiv's cs.LG feed on Nov. 9 report results in analog inference hardware, half-precision weather forecasting, LLM recommendation, retinal screening, graph transformers and dislocation modeling.

The preprints are not peer reviewed, and the abstract pages report no independent replication. The figures below are the authors' own. One paper, on graph transformers, is described as submitted to IEEE BigData 2026.

Inference cost: analog chips, weather models, recommendation

Analog compute-in-memory (CIM) accelerators run matrix-vector products inside memory arrays, but the authors of "Enabling Retraining-Free Accurate Inference in Analog Compute in Memory Accelerators" say converter and device errors make pretrained models unusable on them, and hardware-aware retraining is costly. They report6 that centering inputs and applying Hadamard rotations, with low-cost shared calibration, avoids retraining. Tested on CNNs, vision transformers and LLMs up to 14B parameters on PCM and ReRAM, the method brings vision models and larger LLMs within a few points of floating-point accuracy and matches or approaches published hardware-aware training, according to the abstract. On ReRAM with 6-bit ADCs it restored ViT-B/16 from 37.4% to 82.9% and Phi-4 from 27.0% to 72.2%, both within 2.2 points of floating-point accuracy.

AI weather models are released with 32-bit (fp32) weights and run in fp32 by default, although current GPUs are much faster in 16-bit formats, the authors of "Half-precision inference of AI weather prediction models" write. They ran2 Aurora, Pangu-Weather, FourCastNet, SFNO and FastNet on a single 16 GB GPU from 52 initial dates in 2024 and verified forecasts against ERA5. With the physical state kept in fp32 and the network in fp16, global RMSE changed by at most 1.4%, and by about 0.5% or less for four of the five models. No value overflowed fp16's range. A 10-day forecast was 1.3 to 3.5 times faster and used 1.4 to 3.7 times less energy. bf16 was as fast but less accurate than fp16 for every model, and simple 8-bit quantisation cost far more skill.

In "CascadeRec," the authors describe4 a two-tier LLM reranking cascade deployed at what they call a large financial planning and analysis (FP&A) SaaS provider. A lightweight Tier-1 model reranks every request, and a router escalates only requests likely to benefit from extra compute to a more expensive Tier-2 procedure. The production A/B experiment has run for over a month, and the authors report about 10% lower inference cost than uniform use of the expensive tier, minimal latency impact and no quality regression observed to date. These are the authors' own production results; tenant data cannot be released, so outsiders cannot check them.

On public benchmarks (MovieLens-1M and Amazon-Electronics), the authors found that uniform LLM reranking lowered NDCG@10 for sparse-history users by up to 30%. They also report that escalating cold users can enlarge the loss, and that which segments benefit depends on the domain.

Retinal screening

The authors of the retinal paper propose3 a dual-hub heterogeneous graph neural network that couples fundus-image features with clinical covariates and, they say, exposes decision pathways rather than relying on post-hoc saliency. On the BRSET dataset (16,266 photographs from 8,524 patients), it reached 76.1% Macro-AUPRC across seven conditions, against 75.9% for both an image-only baseline and a ResNet-50+MLP fusion baseline. That is a 0.2-point difference, and the abstract reports no significance test. The largest gains from clinical context were in macular edema (+3.5%) and diabetic retinopathy (+2.1%). The abstract describes no clinical validation.

Graph transformers and dislocation networks

According to the graph-transformer preprint, standard residual streams combine computations from different depths with fixed coefficients shared across nodes. The authors propose5 node-adaptive aggregation using Attention Residuals (AttnRes), instantiated in the GPS and GRIT backbones. On all five ECHO tasks, both variants reached lower mean absolute error than their independently tuned backbones, and at least one had the lowest mean among all compared methods on each task.

The dislocation paper does not use a graph neural network. Its authors represent1 dislocation networks from discrete dislocation dynamics simulations, not experiments, as graphs in five ways. They summarize each with topological properties and predict yield stress from those properties and the applied strain rate using a standard random forest, evaluated with strain-rate-stratified cross-validation. R² was about 0.86 to 0.90 across all box sizes and 0.91 to 0.94 for larger box sizes, consistent across all five representations.